controllers/application.rb <=> spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb when using Alternate File
Reported by Ryan Carmelo Briones | May 1st, 2008 @ 05:42 PM | in 1.1.5
From what I can tell, and what I and Edgecase have been using for as long as I know, the standard practice is to have application.rb specs in spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb, but the tmbundle Alternate File command doesn't take this into account.
Patch at http://github.com/ryanbriones/rs.... If you want a pull request, just let me know.
Comments and changes to this ticket
-
David Chelimsky July 19th, 2008 @ 03:59 AM
- → State changed from new to awaiting-patch
- → Tag changed from to patch textmate
Hey Ryan - looks like you pulled your repo down from github. Any interested in recreating it and this patch?
-
Ryan Carmelo Briones July 31st, 2008 @ 03:11 PM
Heh. I took the repo down just days before this. Thank God for git and it's local repo.
-
David Chelimsky August 5th, 2008 @ 11:07 AM
- → Assigned user changed from to David Chelimsky
- → Milestone changed from No-Milestone-Assigned to 1.1.5
Thanks Ryan,
The patch looks good, but it would look "gooder" if you made it using git-format-patch - then the commit comes from you instead of me. Would you please recreate the patch that way?
-
David Chelimsky August 5th, 2008 @ 11:07 AM
Nevermind that last comment - I already applied the patch.
-
David Chelimsky August 5th, 2008 @ 11:08 AM
- → State changed from awaiting-patch to resolved
(from [8b3bc99c3211b3b319ea5e58faa67013481a197c]) Patch from Ryan Carmelo Briones to map alternate file for application.rb to application_controller_spec.rb. [#396 state:resolved]
Please Login or create a free account to add a new comment.
You can update this ticket by sending an email to from your email client. (help)
Create your profile
Help contribute to this project by taking a few moments to create your personal profile. Create your profile »
Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby.
